ສັງຄົມນິຍົມ: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
ໜ້າໃໝ່: '''ສັງຄົມນິຍົມ''' ({{lang-en|Socialism}}) ແມ່ນລະບົບສັງຄົມແລະເສດຖະກິດ ເຊິ່ງສັງຄົ...
 
No edit summary
ແຖວ 1:
 
'''ສັງຄົມນິຍົມ''' ({{lang-en|Socialism}}) ແມ່ນລະບົບສັງຄົມແລະເສດຖະກິດ ເຊິ່ງສັງຄົມເປັນເຈົ້າຂອງ[[ປັດໄຈການຜະລິດ]]ແລະການຈັດການເສດຖະກິດແບບຮ່ວມມື<ref>{{cite book |author1= Bertrand Badie |author2= Dirk Berg-Schlosser |author3= Leonardo Morlino |title= International Encyclopedia of Political Science |publisher= SAGE Publications, Inc |year= 2011|isbn= 978-1412959636|page = 2456|quote=Socialist systems are those regimes based on the economic and political theory of socialism, which advocates public ownership and cooperative management of the means of production and allocation of resources.}}</ref><ref>[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/551569/socialism ''socialism''] Britannica ACADEMIC EDITION. Retrieved 19 January 2012.</ref> ຕະຫຼອດຈົນທິສະດີແລະຂະບວນການທາງການເມືອງເຊິ່ງມຸ່ງສະຖາປະນາລະບົບດັ່ງກ່າວ<ref>"2. (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) any of various social or political theories or movements in which the common welfare is to be achieved through the establishment of a socialist economic system" [http://www.thefreedictionary.com/socialism "Socialism" at The Free dictionary]</ref><ref name="ReferenceC">"The origins of socialism as a political movement lie in the Industrial Revolution." [http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/551569/socialism "Socialism" in [[Encyclopedia Britannica]] Online]</ref> "ສັງຄົມເປັນເຈົ້າຂອງ" ອາດໝາຍເຖິງ ການປະກອບການ[[ສະຫະກອນ]] ການເປັນເຈົ້າຂອງຮ່ວມ ລັດເປັນເຈົ້າຂອງ ພົນລະເມືອງເປັນເຈົ້າຂອງຄວາມສະເໝີພາບ ພົນລະເມືອງເປັນເຈົ້າຂອງກຳມະສິດ ຫຼືທີ່ກ່າວມາລວມກັນ.<ref>{{cite book |last= O'Hara|first= Phillip |title= Encyclopedia of Political Economy, Volume 2 |publisher= [[Routledge]]|date=September 2003|isbn= 0-415-24187-1|page = 71|quote=In order of increasing decentralisation (at least) three forms of socialized ownership can be distinguished: state-owned firms, employee-owned (or socially) owned firms, and citizen ownership of equity.}}</ref>. ມີຄວາມຜັນແປຂອງສັງຄົມນິຍົມຫຼາຍແລະບໍ່ມີນິຍາມໃດຄອບຄຸມທັງໝົດ<ref>Peter Lamb, J. C. Docherty. ''Historical dictionary of socialism''. Lanham, Maryland, UK; Oxford, England, UK: Scarecrow Press, Inc, 2006. p. 1.</ref> ຄວາມຜັນແປເຫຼົ່ານີ້ ແມ່ນຕ່າງກັນໃນປະເພດຂອງການເປັນເຈົ້າຂອງໂດຍສັງຄົມທີ່ສົ່ງເສີມ ລະດັບທີ່ເພິ່ງພາຕະຫຼາດຫຼືການວາງແຜນ ວິທີຈັດລະບຽບການຈັດການພາຍໃນສະຖາບັນການຜະລິດ ແລະບົດບາດຂອງລັດໃນການສ້າງສັງຄົມນິຍົມ.<ref>Nove, Alec. ''Socialism''. New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second Edition (2008): http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_S000173</ref>.
 
ລະບົບເສດຖະກິດສັງຄົມນິຍົມອາໄສລັດທິອົງການການຜະລິດເພື່ອໃຊ້ ໝາຍຄວາມວ່າ ຜະລິດສິນຄ້າແລະບໍລິການເພື່ອຕອບສະໜອງອຸປະສົງທາງເສດຖະກິດແລະຄວາມຈຳເປັນຂອງມະນຸດໂດຍກົງ ແລະລະບຸຄຸນຄ່າວັດຖຸຕາມຄຸນຄ່າການໃຊ້ປະໂຫຍດ ຫຼືອັດຖະປະໂຫຍດ ເຊິ່ງກົງຂ້າມກັບການຜະລິດມາເພື່ອສະສົມທຶນແລະເພື່ອກຳໄລ.<ref>"Socialism and Capitalism: Are They Qualitatively Different Socioeconomic Systems?", by Kotz, David M. Retrieved February 19, 2011, from University of Massachusetts: http://people.umass.edu/dmkotz/Soc_and_Cap_Diff_Syst_06_12.pdf: "This understanding of socialism was held not just by revolutionary Marxist socialists but also by evolutionary socialists, Christian socialists, and even anarchists. At that time, there was also wide agreement about the basic institutions of the future socialist system: public ownership instead of private ownership of the means of production, economic planning instead of market forces, production for use instead of for profit."</ref> ໃນແນວຄິດເດີມຂອງເສດຖະກິດສັງຄົມນິຍົມ ມີການປະສານງານ ການເຮັດບັນຊີ ແລະການປະເມີນຄ່າຢ່າງດຽວກັນໂດຍປະລິມານທາງກາຍະພາບຮ່ວມ (common physical magnitude) ຫຼືການແທກແຮງງານ-ເວລາແທນການຄຳນວນທາງການເງິນ.<ref>''Market Socialism: The Debate Among Socialists'', by Schweickart, David; Lawler, James; Ticktin, Hillel; Ollman, Bertell. 1998. From "The Difference Between Marxism and Market Socialism" (pp. 61–63): "More fundamentally, a socialist society must be one in which the economy is run on the principle of the direct satisfaction of human needs...Exchange-value, prices and so money are goals in themselves in a capitalist society or in any market. There is no necessary connection between the accumulation of capital or sums of money and human welfare. Under conditions of backwardness, the spur of money and the accumulation of wealth has led to a massive growth in industry and technology ... It seems an odd argument to say that a capitalist will only be efficient in producing use-value of a good quality when trying to make more money than the next capitalist. It would seem easier to rely on the planning of use-values in a rational way, which because there is no duplication, would be produced more cheaply and be of a higher quality."</ref><ref>{{cite book |last= Bockman|first= Johanna |title= Markets in the name of Socialism: The Left-Wing origins of Neoliberalism|publisher= Stanford University Press|year= 2011|isbn= 978-0-8047-7566-3}}</ref> ມີສອງຂໍ້ສະເໜີໃນການກະຈາຍຜົນຜະລິດ ໜຶ່ງ ຍຶດຕາມຫຼັກທີ່ວ່າໃຫ້ກະຈາຍແກ່ແຕ່ລະຄົນຕາມການເຂົ້າມີສ່ວນຮ່ວມ ແລະສອງ ຍຶດຕາມຫຼັກຜະລິດຈາກທຸກຄົນຕາມຄວາມສາມາດ ໃຫ້ແກ່ທຸກຄົນຕາມຄວາມຈຳເປັນ. ວິທີການຈັດສັນແລະປະເມີນຄ່າຊັບພະຍາກອນຢ່າງແນ່ຊັດ ຍັງເປັນຫົວຂໍ້ຖົກຖຽງໃນການຖົກຖຽງການຄຳນວນສັງຄົມນິຍົມທີ່ກວ້າງກວ່າ.